01 Map
Discover the connections
Map application paths and choose what to protect.
Harvest now. Decrypt later.
Quantum risk starts with traffic captured today.
Payments service
→ Sent as usual
Weavelet
Encrypted today
Weavelet
Core banking
✓ Delivered unchanged
Captured todayat risk
0 simulated packets
Captured after protectionpost-quantum
0 simulated packets
- ✓Tested
- ✓Verified
- ✓Evidence signed
PASS · 14/14example evidence record
Captured today. At risk tomorrow.
Today’s traffic is encrypted, but its key exchange relies on public-key cryptography that a sufficiently capable quantum computer could break. An attacker can store the traffic now and try to decrypt it later — so data that must stay secret for years is already exposed.
Two Weavelets, one beside each endpoint, establish a single post-quantum channel (CW1) between them. The application keeps using its existing protocol and needs no code changes. Traffic captured before protection keeps its original risk; only new traffic is protected.
CipherWeave runs the approved application workload through the protected path and answers five control questions with fourteen checks:
- Does the application work?4/4
- Did traffic use the protected path?3/3
- Is required security active?3/3
- Does deployment match approval?3/3
- Did response time meet the limit? p95 baseline 41 ms · protected 46 ms · limit 60 ms (illustrative)1/1
The results are sealed into a signed evidence package that others can inspect. Technical overview →
- ML-KEM-1024 key establishment
- ML-DSA-87 authentication
- AES-256-GCM traffic encryption
Illustrative demonstration with simulated traffic. Production verification executes the approved application workload.
How it works
AI-guided cryptographic migration. Proven at runtime.
AI proposes. You approve. Runtime proves.
02 Approve
Approve the change
Review the protection, deployment, and test plan together.
03 Verify
Inspect the result
Runtime checks produce signed evidence for the tested path.
Inside the evidence
Don’t trust the dashboard.
Inspect the record.
Every verification produces a signed package that says exactly what was tested, against which approval, and what was measured.
- Bound to one run. Every verdict is tied to the application, path, deployment, approval and test contract it covers.
- Honest about gaps. Each check returns PASS, FAIL or INCOMPLETE. Missing evidence is never reported as success.
- Verifiable by others. The package is signed, so anyone can confirm it hasn’t been altered.
- Application
- Payments service → core banking
- Communication path
- payments → core · existing internal protocol
- Deployment
- Field Weavelet ↔ Cloud Weavelet over CW1
- Approved path
- sha384:9f2c…e81a
- Deployment bundle
- sha384:41b7…07cd
- Test contract
- sha384:c03e…5b92
- Run
- 2026-10-20T14:02Z · immutable
Does the application work? 4/4
- Request accepted
- Command published
- Device replied
- Transaction reconciled
Did traffic use the protected path? 3/3
- Protected route observed
- Direct bypass blocked
- Alternate bypass blocked
Is required security active? 3/3
- Approved cipher suite in use
- Weavelet peers authenticated
- No prohibited plaintext on the wire
Does deployment match approval? 3/3
- Binary matches approved digest
- Effective configuration matches
- Application source identity matches
Did response time meet the limit? 1/1
- Protected p95 within approved threshold
p95 response time
Baseline41 ms
Protected46 ms
Approved limit60 ms
- Transactions
- 1,000
- Packets captured on the WAN
- 3,042
- Plaintext payload matches
- 0
- Verdict
- PASS · 14/14
- Package
- Approvals, deployment references, runtime observations, evaluated checks
- Signature
- verified
The record covers this run only. It does not claim continuous protection — any affecting change requires renewed approval and another run.
Example record with illustrative values.
ML-KEM-1024Post-quantum key establishment
ML-DSA-87Post-quantum peer authentication
14Runtime checks on every verification
0Changes to the application on either side
Readiness check
Will your secrets outlive your encryption?
Mosca’s inequality is a simple test: if your data must stay secret for X years and migrating takes Y years, you are exposed whenever X + Y exceeds Z — the years until a quantum computer can break today’s public-key cryptography.
Try your own numbers →
Exposure window
8years
Data sent before your migration finishes could be readable for 8 years while it is still meant to be secret.
CipherWeave shrinks Y: protect the paths that matter first, without waiting for every application to be rewritten.
Start small. Prove it. Expand.
Start with one connection.
Pick the application path that worries you most. We’ll protect it and hand you signed evidence that it worked.
or write to hello@cipherweave.com